<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Employment in a Just Economy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/employment-in-a-just-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/employment-in-a-just-economy/</link>
	<description>15th May to 15th July 2016</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen I. Ternyik		</title>
		<link>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/employment-in-a-just-economy/#comment-54</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen I. Ternyik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 06:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=79#comment-54</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for attacking this very important socio-economic problem of `making a living and preserving self-esteem`, Prof. Komlos! The NAIRU is indeed the ACRU (artificially created rate of unemployment) and the monetary theory behind this coining has already proven to be economically not sustainable. Economic systems evolution empirically points now to a more just economy as envisioned by John Rawls or to a historical tragedy of social explosion, in thermo-economic terms. The binary introduction of a basic income guarantee (envisioned e.g. by T.Paine) and the right to labor (to earn an income) could restore human dignity under the current conditions, i.e. computer power is destroying `jobs` in an accelerated manner. We will have economically to be very creative to institutionalize an income for all citizens in a just economy, to balance the ongoing `creative destruction` of our socio-economic fabric.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for attacking this very important socio-economic problem of `making a living and preserving self-esteem`, Prof. Komlos! The NAIRU is indeed the ACRU (artificially created rate of unemployment) and the monetary theory behind this coining has already proven to be economically not sustainable. Economic systems evolution empirically points now to a more just economy as envisioned by John Rawls or to a historical tragedy of social explosion, in thermo-economic terms. The binary introduction of a basic income guarantee (envisioned e.g. by T.Paine) and the right to labor (to earn an income) could restore human dignity under the current conditions, i.e. computer power is destroying `jobs` in an accelerated manner. We will have economically to be very creative to institutionalize an income for all citizens in a just economy, to balance the ongoing `creative destruction` of our socio-economic fabric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
