<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>labour &#8211; Capital Accumulation, Production and Employment:</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/tag/labour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net</link>
	<description>15th May to 15th July 2016</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The British Labour Party and the ‘New Economics’</title>
		<link>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/the-british-labour-party-and-the-new-economics/</link>
					<comments>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/the-british-labour-party-and-the-new-economics/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capital2016]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 20:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics and democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macroeconomics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=90</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The election in September 2015 of the socialist MP Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party came as a profound shock to the British political establishment. Few dreamed it possible just a few months earlier. Corbyn’s campaign platform was &#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election in September 2015 of the socialist MP Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party came as a profound shock to the British political establishment. Few dreamed it possible just a few months earlier. Corbyn’s campaign platform was overtly left-wing in its economic proposals, including condemnation of austerity, increased public investment, targeted public ownership, and tax justice against avoidance by corporations and rich individuals. Since his election, Corbyn and his Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell have continued to develop the ideas sketched in the campaign towards a coherent programme for the party’s next election manifesto. Central to that will be an alternative approach for managing public finances to the austerity of the Conservative government aiming at fiscal surpluses, but the discussion on the ‘New Economics’ goes well beyond macroeconomic policy into questions such as innovation, inequality and the labour market. Reviews of key institutions such as the Bank of England and Treasury are promised. This paper explains the background to Labour’s electoral defeat and Corbyn’s subsequent victory, then discusses economic policy before briefly considering what we should learn for campaigning and narratives. It investigates the underpinnings of the emerging programme and its potential to ‘bend the arc of global capital towards justice’ on issues such as investment, taxation or wages, discussing the UK in the international context of the aftermath of the financial crash. At issue here is not an exercise in criticising capitalism, but the practical problem of defining a realistic programme offering genuine progress in contemporary Britain, with sufficient credibility to attract both electoral backing and active support against hostility from global elites. There are lessons and questions here that go beyond the British Labour Party. I give an overview of the issues and during the Conference discussion will offer more detail on areas that attract interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/the-british-labour-party-and-the-new-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global business models and labor challenges</title>
		<link>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/global-business-models-and-labor-challenges/</link>
					<comments>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/global-business-models-and-labor-challenges/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capital2016]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 17:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance, investment, production and employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private equity funds]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=64</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today, private equity funds express the power of centralized money to define not only investment flows but also working conditions. Indeed, private equity funds have been responsible for the employment standards of tens of millions of workers worldwide and the &#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Today, private equity funds express the power of centralized money to define not only investment flows but also working conditions. Indeed, private equity funds have been responsible for the employment standards of tens of millions of workers worldwide and the impacts of private equity investments on working conditions is raising growing concerns. The social impacts of the private equity business model based on “rationalization” have been less explored by academic researchers, while extensive studies have been developed by private sector companies and industry bodies that tend to report only stories of success. Taking into account that financialization enhances the redistribution and reallocation of power and wealth, this paper assesses, from a Keynesian approach, that the private equity funds’ business model foster social vulnerabilities. After presenting a brief overview of global business environment and the post-crisis evolution of private equity funds, this paper discuss the factors that shape the microeconomic and macroeconomic effects of their typical investment strategies. Rather than treating private equity funds as a financial phenomenon, the analysis rethinks the relations between private equity funds and labour as involving forms of production at the current frontier of capital.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://capital2016.weaconferences.net/papers/global-business-models-and-labor-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
